My Pete rebuild |
01-02-2020, (Subject: My Pete rebuild ) Post: #469 | |||
| |||
RE: My Pete rebuild Has anyone ever checked or recorded piston protrusion? It's not listed anywhere on quickserve. | |||
01-02-2020, (Subject: My Pete rebuild ) Post: #470 | |||
| |||
RE: My Pete rebuild Shouldn't need to right? As long as your rods and pistons measure the same length as OEM, you should be good. What makes you think about this? | |||
01-02-2020, (Subject: My Pete rebuild ) Post: #471 | |||
| |||
RE: My Pete rebuild Because I've been overthinking EVERYTHING and the next step is to slap the head on this thing lol. That and Rawze has mentioned compression ratios more than once, I was more curious than anything. Also curious on these anti-polish rings - I'd think they'd just be asking to fret the head. I just know that the next time the tops of these pistons are visible, there's a very good chance that I'm going to be filling the liners with tannerite. | |||
01-02-2020, (Subject: My Pete rebuild ) Post: #472 | |||
| |||
RE: My Pete rebuild I've thought the same thing about those rings. | |||
01-03-2020, (Subject: My Pete rebuild ) Post: #473 | |||
| |||
RE: My Pete rebuild I have not seen it yet. Only fretting I see is when there are also liner issues. User's Signature: ->: What I post is just my own thoughts and Opinions! --- I AM Full Of S__T!. | |||
01-03-2020, (Subject: My Pete rebuild ) Post: #474 | |||
| |||
RE: My Pete rebuild 280k on overhaul with a head that was reused when previous owners overhauled it there wasn't a single scratch on it from those rings User's Signature: 2010 Lonestar - CM871 - 13sp - 3.70s, 2016 T680 - cm2350 - 13sp - 3.36s - skateboarder | |||
01-03-2020, (Subject: My Pete rebuild ) Post: #475 | |||
| |||
RE: My Pete rebuild Huh, who'da thunk it since they're essentially free to dance around. Measuring my old gasket crush at approx .080", the rings have approx a .063" protrusion from the liner flange, leaving .017" of free space. | |||
01-04-2020, (Subject: My Pete rebuild ) Post: #476 | |||
| |||
RE: My Pete rebuild (01-03-2020 )Nostalgic Wrote: Huh, who'da thunk it since they're essentially free to dance around. Measuring my old gasket crush at approx .080", the rings have approx a .063" protrusion from the liner flange, leaving .017" of free space. makes me wonder if aftermarket gasket is thicker?. that could explain a lot of compression differences. - old isx used to have thicker gasket and 'fire rings' installed the gasket to keep the combustion gasses in. User's Signature: ->: What I post is just my own thoughts and Opinions! --- I AM Full Of S__T!. | |||
01-04-2020, (Subject: My Pete rebuild ) Post: #477 | |||
| |||
RE: My Pete rebuild I guess it's possible, but if the IPD gasket was thicker, it would have reduced compression to some degree. I didn't mic the Cummins HG, not that it would matter without a before/after measurement, and I really don't want to open this thing up again...ever lol. I did 150', then did two sets of 300' before calling it a night. One nice thing about the OE Cummins kit (and head), is the USA markings on everything. I don't think it was always like that, but I don't think there was anything in the crate that didn't list US as the origin. | |||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest » |
NOTE: Rawze.com is not affiliated, nor endorses any of the google ads that are displayed on this website.