CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end |
03-14-2017, (Subject: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end ) Post: #4 | |||
| |||
RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end Thanks Mr Hag, perhaps I should have worded it slightly differently, if someone took a 2250 in frame kit, could it be installed in an 870/1 block, reusing the crank and block only? Then re-using all the 2250 ancillary parts installed on it. As we discussed via PM I'm looking at a truck that's had its engine let go due to ceramic plungers and have the opportunity to pick up a complete 871 cheaply, was looking at it for cheap insurance in case the 2250 motor had spun a main. | |||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest » |
Messages In This Thread |
CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Liquidforce - 03-13-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Rawze - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Running rough - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Rawze - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Running rough - 03-16-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Rawze - 03-16-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Running rough - 03-16-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Mr Hagg - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Liquidforce - 03-14-2017 RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Signature620 - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - hhow55 - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Liquidforce - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Signature620 - 03-15-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Running rough - 03-17-2017, |
NOTE: Rawze.com is not affiliated, nor endorses any of the google ads that are displayed on this website.