Helping Waterloo out with an inframe ...
04-10-2018, (Subject: Helping Waterloo out with an inframe ... ) 
Post: #48
RE: Helping Waterloo out with an inframe ...
(04-10-2018 )Chamberpains Wrote:  I guess I'm in a question asking mood this morning. But I need to know, how exactly did you guys find out it was the wrong parts and kit installed? What exactly did you look at? What numbers on what parts gave this away?
Also, did you find any problems with the internal components? Being the programming wasn't correct in the ECM to what was in the engine. Did it show any signs of being way out of whack and running bad?

The insides of the cylinders, top of the pistons, bottom of the head all looked good. They look like it has not been running too lean, nor too dirty. Spray patterns on pistons are a bit low (programming not matching injectors installed). His fuel mileage was under par and the injector tips were a bit burnt likely due to the programming mis-match but he was also not driving it hard at all. I suppose it could have been worse.

The parts he had in it were mid tier parts ...
Injector cam: 3684306
Valve cam: 4298626
Injector(s): 4954434
Overhaul Kit: 4376175

And it calls for the higher sig-600 tier parts ...
Injector cam: 4101432
Valve cam: 4059331
Injector(s): 4088665
Overhaul Kit: 4376174


User's Signature: ->: What I post is just my own thoughts and Opinions! --- I AM Full Of S__T!.
replyreply
 Thanks given by: Chamberpains , redbeard , barf , overshot , zero4 , LargeCar


Messages In This Thread
Caveat emptor - Waterloo - 04-09-2018,
RE: Helping Waterloo out with an inframe ... - Rawze - 04-10-2018



NOTE: Rawze.com is not affiliated, nor endorses any of the google ads that are displayed on this website.