Another bad crossover valve. |
08-09-2018, (Subject: Another bad crossover valve. ) Post: #3 | |||
| |||
RE: Another bad crossover valve. I have considered this, but haven't really thought about it until it became a problem again today. I'm going to be taking the hoses back off to verify they are good and free flowing, maybe I got a bad length of hose...but I doubt it. I went top shelf on having those made. I do have drains on the bottom of both tanks, that are fairly well protected by the tank brackets. I could run a JIC elbow to a crossover tube, up to the frame and around the crossmember and down to the other tank, but I'd rather get it working properly (if I can) first. Why not control return flow restriction with a ball valve in the return on the top of the tank? It would take a little bit of fudging with it, but I could remove the crossover and replace with a standard tee and adjust the return rate manually if needed, and be able to isolate a tank in the event of a leak or failure as well... User's Signature: 2010 T2000, CM871, 13spd, 977k, tanker yanker Overhauled @ 927k | |||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest » |
Messages In This Thread |
Another bad crossover valve. - dhirocz - 08-09-2018, RE: Another bad levelling valve. - Unilevers - 08-09-2018, RE: Another bad crossover valve. - dhirocz - 08-09-2018 RE: Another bad crossover valve. - Kid Rock - 08-09-2018, RE: Another bad crossover valve. - dhirocz - 08-10-2018, RE: Another bad crossover valve. - Rawze - 08-10-2018, RE: Another bad crossover valve. - dhirocz - 08-10-2018, RE: Another bad crossover valve. - snailexpress - 08-10-2018, RE: Another bad crossover valve. - dhirocz - 08-10-2018, RE: Another bad crossover valve. - Chamberpains - 08-10-2018, |
NOTE: Rawze.com is not affiliated, nor endorses any of the google ads that are displayed on this website.