2014 Pete 386 |
09-22-2019, (Subject: 2014 Pete 386 ) Post: #4 | |||
| |||
RE: 2014 Pete 386 (09-22-2019 )Rawze Wrote: CON: Significantly less fuel efficient than a prostar or cascadia. 0.3 - 0.4mpg on average. = a cost of several thousand dollars a year in fuel consumption. If a person is trying to be competitive in the market, this may or may not be significant. Thank you for your input.. Here are the particulars on this truck. It 'was' fleet owned, drivers did not sleep in the trucks, but stayed in motels (researched the company and asked questions), Engine is ISX15 500HP CM2350, 18 speed, 3:36 rears, low pro 22.5, 48" mid roof sleeper. I operate a flatbed in the mountains of SC, NC, GA, TN and AL mostly regional work, hauling between 76-80K one way, empty return. According to the Cummins report the DEF dosing valve was replaced at 12,143, Campaign-Relief valve at 92,146 and the Fuel Pump Tippets at 188,439. It has a Red Oval Warranty for 1 year or 125K miles included in the price of the truck. 260K miles/6700 engine hours. I've been in a 379 for the past 12 years, but it's time for a change. We ran a RigDig on this unit also, nothing of interest. I asked for Cummins service records to see what this brings up as well. | |||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest » |
NOTE: Rawze.com is not affiliated, nor endorses any of the google ads that are displayed on this website.