CM2350 factory file comparrisons...

[Carhauler]

(02-28-2020 )Rawze Wrote:  

(02-28-2020 )Carhauler Wrote:  Thanks Rawze,




Just curious, what is accelerator noise control exactly?

basically an algorithm that softens the acceleration and deceleration a bit if memory serves me right.

Ah ok. Was mainly looking to rid of Smart Torque... it doesnt seem so smart to me

[marek4792]

Not sure if an x15 relates to this thread but I'm curious about my ecm code HD10381 CPL4343 and the difference between 485 all the way up to 605.

[truckerboy]

Hi all, is there any file that is compatible with EF10057 that is higher than 500hp?

[lane458]

Was also looking into uprating X15 CPL4343 605hp trucks. I'm thinking 605hp 2050tq is probably the ceiling for the trucks, but it would be nice to squeeze a little more out them if possible with factory files.

[marek4792]

What do you have now in it? Running Rough has been tinkering with x15s and actually prefers the 565/2050 file over the 605/2050 version, and performs better than the 605 file. What application are you running? 2050 isn't really needed in most situations and can be overkill.

[Rawze]

(03-06-2021 )lane458 Wrote:  Was also looking into uprating X15 CPL4343 605hp trucks. I'm thinking 605hp 2050tq is probably the ceiling for the trucks, but it would be nice to squeeze a little more out them if possible with factory files.

the more you up the torque, the shorter the engine lifespan... by a LOT!

At 2050 torque, you'de be doing good to get 650k miles out of a highway truck as it is before the head had to come of it vs. close to a million miles at 1750-trq.

It is far cheaper to replace the rears with a better spec than it is to torture your engine.

[tree98]

I think that 2050 torque program makes all the additional torque in the lower rpm's, you definitely don't want that.