CM2350 factory file comparrisons...
02-28-2020, (Subject: CM2350 factory file comparrisons... ) 
Post: #28
RE: CM2350 factory file comparrisons...
(02-28-2020 )Rawze Wrote:  
(02-28-2020 )Carhauler Wrote:  Thanks Rawze,




Just curious, what is accelerator noise control exactly?

basically an algorithm that softens the acceleration and deceleration a bit if memory serves me right.

Ah ok. Was mainly looking to rid of Smart Torque... it doesnt seem so smart to me
replyreply
03-15-2020, (Subject: CM2350 factory file comparrisons... ) 
Post: #29
RE: CM2350 factory file comparrisons...
Not sure if an x15 relates to this thread but I'm curious about my ecm code HD10381 CPL4343 and the difference between 485 all the way up to 605.
replyreply
09-03-2020, (Subject: CM2350 factory file comparrisons... ) 
Post: #30
RE: CM2350 factory file comparrisons...
Hi all, is there any file that is compatible with EF10057 that is higher than 500hp?
replyreply
03-06-2021, (Subject: CM2350 factory file comparrisons... ) 
Post: #31
RE: CM2350 factory file comparrisons...
Was also looking into uprating X15 CPL4343 605hp trucks. I'm thinking 605hp 2050tq is probably the ceiling for the trucks, but it would be nice to squeeze a little more out them if possible with factory files.
replyreply
03-06-2021, (Subject: CM2350 factory file comparrisons... ) 
Post: #32
RE: CM2350 factory file comparrisons...
What do you have now in it? Running Rough has been tinkering with x15s and actually prefers the 565/2050 file over the 605/2050 version, and performs better than the 605 file. What application are you running? 2050 isn't really needed in most situations and can be overkill.
replyreply
03-06-2021, (Subject: CM2350 factory file comparrisons... ) 
Post: #33
RE: CM2350 factory file comparrisons...
(03-06-2021 )lane458 Wrote:  Was also looking into uprating X15 CPL4343 605hp trucks. I'm thinking 605hp 2050tq is probably the ceiling for the trucks, but it would be nice to squeeze a little more out them if possible with factory files.

the more you up the torque, the shorter the engine lifespan... by a LOT!

At 2050 torque, you'de be doing good to get 650k miles out of a highway truck as it is before the head had to come of it vs. close to a million miles at 1750-trq.

It is far cheaper to replace the rears with a better spec than it is to torture your engine.


User's Signature: ->: What I post is just my own thoughts and Opinions! --- I AM Full Of S__T!.
replyreply
03-07-2021, (Subject: CM2350 factory file comparrisons... ) 
Post: #34
RE: CM2350 factory file comparrisons...
I think that 2050 torque program makes all the additional torque in the lower rpm's, you definitely don't want that.


User's Signature: Warranty??? Yeah right, I am the warranty!!!
replyreply





  
  
Theme by MyBB Addict
Contact Us | Rawze.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication