CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end |
03-14-2017, (Subject: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end ) Post: #9 | |||
| |||
RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end Thanks Signature 620, I assume no great issue in re-using the 871 air pump, but obviously fuel pump would pose an issue, no-one by chance happens to have both pumps sitting around. I see a number of wreckers advertise the blocks as non- egr, or egr onwards, I wonder if it's mis-information on there behalf or it's workable. Do the 871 have the external mounts but just not drilled/tapped? I can't imagine cummins would have retooled the block extensively to go to common rail. | |||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest » |
Messages In This Thread |
CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Liquidforce - 03-13-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Rawze - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Running rough - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Rawze - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Running rough - 03-16-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Rawze - 03-16-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Running rough - 03-16-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Mr Hagg - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Liquidforce - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Signature620 - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - hhow55 - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Liquidforce - 03-14-2017 RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Signature620 - 03-15-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Running rough - 03-17-2017, |
NOTE: Rawze.com is not affiliated, nor endorses any of the google ads that are displayed on this website.