CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end |
03-16-2017, (Subject: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end ) Post: #13 | |||
| |||
RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end it seems stock timing is not as snappy on my 2250, I put soi increment off and torque response is reduced a bit but it is still very drivable, in fact it feels like I can work the engine now without fear of a vibration and such, it will still pull like a mule under full trottle it just seems you have to work the throttle a little more to do the seem thing, I like the quieter ideal as well, but if I really wanted to tune it in and get my response back I would do so above ideal rpm and increase the soi by the seem 3 degrees from low to about 50 percent fueling and leave the heavier fueling stock, that would give a guy a sharper torqueier throotle response but like I said it is pretty good still all on its own, I might leave it, but I am not quite sure what mode my 2250 runs in, but I believe my 871 runs in mode4 | |||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest » |
Messages In This Thread |
CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Liquidforce - 03-13-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Rawze - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Running rough - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Rawze - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Running rough - 03-16-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Rawze - 03-16-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Running rough - 03-16-2017 RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Mr Hagg - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Liquidforce - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Signature620 - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - hhow55 - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Liquidforce - 03-14-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Signature620 - 03-15-2017, RE: CM871 vs CM2250 bottom end - Running rough - 03-17-2017, |
NOTE: Rawze.com is not affiliated, nor endorses any of the google ads that are displayed on this website.