Fixed Vane vs Variable Geometry Turbochargers... |
09-19-2017, (Subject: Fixed Vane vs Variable Geometry Turbochargers... ) Post: #12 | |||
| |||
RE: Fixed Vane vs Variable Geometry Turbochargers... (09-19-2017 )Rig Wrench Wrote: Anyone know a better turbo for a cm570 better than the hX60?. It's setting right at 700rwhp now. It does ok but the egt's start to creep up. No issue changing to another manifold with a T6 flange. a HT4B or HT4C work well in those higher HP applications, they are good to about 1000 crank hp and for about 60 psi if your rig can hold it. if you go for the billet wheels and the 11 blade compressor wheel they spool better than the stocker but have more boost at similar fueling levels. They are a T6 BTW they are also fairly cheap i believe they are 84mm/128mm ish on the wheel size. | |||
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest » |
NOTE: Rawze.com is not affiliated, nor endorses any of the google ads that are displayed on this website.