Fixed Vane vs Variable Geometry Turbochargers...
09-19-2017, (Subject: Fixed Vane vs Variable Geometry Turbochargers... ) 
Post: #18
RE: Fixed Vane vs Variable Geometry Turbochargers...
(09-19-2017 )Rig Wrench Wrote:  
(09-19-2017 )Unilevers Wrote:  careful with the ball bearing garrets, they are dam finicky on turbo surge and chuff

You find that a cummins gets away with a smaller turbo than a cat at the same level. I have a w/g 175963 I believe on the shelf. Was thinkin about tryin it. See what happens

they do have alot less exhaust energy in my experience aswell. 171702 BW on a cat or detroit - 550 hp maybe 585, on a cummins its good for 650 all day.
replyreply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Fixed Vane vs Variable Geometry Turbochargers... - Unilevers - 09-19-2017



NOTE: Rawze.com is not affiliated, nor endorses any of the google ads that are displayed on this website.