Engine rebuilt, finally |
11-04-2016, (Subject: Engine rebuilt, finally ) Post: #3 | |||
| |||
RE: Engine rebuilt, finally (11-04-2016 )Sasquatch Wrote: Hello there, Oh Great and Wise Council, BTW: As far as I know, it is ok for a financial establishment to dictate WHAT QUALIFICATIONS you have to meet for financed service work to be done as long as it falls into a generic category of their requirements (like S.A.E. certified shop etc.) within reasonable bounds. On the other hand, it is ILLEGAL for them to tell you that you can only have it done at a certain place. That would be considered loansharking. Another similar example that I see a lot of for this, is a company that hires O/O's and leases trucks to them. It is illegal for them to hire you as a 1099 contractor and then turn around and force you to use their in-house repair shop, or their preferred repair facility only. This constitutes that you are now nothing more than an employee. Take a good look at this sometime... http://www.strausslawyers.com/owner-oper...oyee-test/ A clear one in your case is this one: Example of Facts Tending to Show an Employment Relationship: Driver cannot choose his/her own mechanics, tires, fuel, or insurance. Driver cannot subcontract out his/her work. === As far as the truck goes... I would get back with the person/place who put MM-2 in it last and have the ECM looked at right away. No need to blow up a fresh re-man motor just because you don't know what is going on. If not, that thing may very well put you on the side of the road when you least expect it. | |||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest » |
Messages In This Thread |
Engine rebuilt, finally - Sasquatch - 11-04-2016, RE: Engine rebuilt, finally - Nilao - 11-04-2016, RE: Engine rebuilt, finally - Marajin - 11-04-2016 |
NOTE: Rawze.com is not affiliated, nor endorses any of the google ads that are displayed on this website.