The Mothership needs an MPG Boost |
05-29-2016, (Subject: The Mothership needs an MPG Boost ) Post: #19 | |||
| |||
RE: The Mothership needs an MPG Boost I'll get the ECM details together and programming so we can go to the next step. | |||
05-30-2016, (Subject: The Mothership needs an MPG Boost ) Post: #20 | |||
| |||
RE: The Mothership needs an MPG Boost What's so bad about 3.36 rears? My two new pete's have 3.25 with super singles. They run at 1300 at 65 mph and rarely downshift going up hills. Avg65-70k on a car hauler. | |||
05-30-2016, (Subject: The Mothership needs an MPG Boost ) Post: #21 | |||
| |||
RE: The Mothership needs an MPG Boost (05-30-2016 )jorden486 Wrote: What's so bad about 3.36 rears? My two new pete's have 3.25 with super singles. They run at 1300 at 65 mph and rarely downshift going up hills. Avg65-70k on a car hauler. I have 3.36 too. At 65mph I get 1350rpm.There is no problem going flatland but going hills need to downshift abit. I average 8mpg. User's Signature: Cascadia ISX15 CM2350 | |||
05-30-2016, (Subject: The Mothership needs an MPG Boost ) Post: #22 | |||
| |||
RE: The Mothership needs an MPG Boost Amazing what a greaae job can do....mileage went up to 6.8 and hit 7 for a while. Brakes must have b been binding a bit. Oil temps are too high ( 226+ most ofl the time ) Rawze was right about the bad airflow. Going to go synthetic next oil change. Anybody use Lubrication Engineers products? | |||
06-04-2016, (Subject: The Mothership needs an MPG Boost ) Post: #23 | |||
| |||
RE: The Mothership needs an MPG Boost Looks like the Mothership is loosening up, I am getting a consistent 7 mpg loaded after getting the oil changed and fuel filters replaced. This is on level, slightly rolling terrain. The truck is getting better. | |||
« Next Oldest | Next Newest » |
NOTE: Rawze.com is not affiliated, nor endorses any of the google ads that are displayed on this website.