RIP CM2250, 2013, 800,000km 20,000 hrs
08-04-2022, (Subject: RIP CM2250, 2013, 800,000km 20,000 hrs ) 
Post: #82
RE: RIP CM2250, 2013, 800,000km 20,000 hrs
(08-04-2022 )Hermjeji Wrote:  ...
What am I missing?

On a common rail engine .. the commanded and measured fuel rail pressures will normally be off by up to about 300 bar, maybe a bit more under high loads. This is absolutely normal.

This is because the design for the rail pressure circuits are known as a hydraulic "Bypass-Charging" system...

--- I.E.> the pump provides all the flow and pressure that it can make to the rail because a bypass valve closes, diverting it all to the rail ... and once it reaches the commanded pressure, the bypass valve opens and makes the fuel pump go into a hydraulic state of "neutral", it not providing anything any more. It stays there in neutral until a set amount of fuel is consumed and the pressure falls off again. The pressure has to bleed back down on its own to about 300 bar or so below the commanded pressure before the valve is closed to make it pump again.

That is how it is supposed to work, so that the bypass valve is not over-worked to death due to having to try to make an exact pressure all the time, also so that the pump can go into neutral to cool off between feed cycles, and finally, so that the fuel temp itself does not get extremely hot due to massive pressure drops that an old style ball-spring regulator would suffer from at those extreme pressures.

The data in the screen above seems to reflect this as well. and looks ok for the most part to me.

and BY THE WAY.... That injector performance test.. and the cylinder performance tests ARE ABSOLUTELY AND UTTERLY USELESS!!!.. IT IS COMPLETE GARBAGE!!!.. STOP USING IT TO GAUGE YOUR ENGINE BY!!!!... IT WILL FAIL PERFECTLY GOOD INJECTORS.. AND TELL YOU THAT BAD ONES, THAT THERE IS NOTING WRONG!!... -- THAT PERFORMANCE TEST SHOULD NOT EXIST IN THE ENGINE SOFTWARE --- stop using it.. just stop!!!!!!


DO THE TESTS RECOMMENDED ON HERE, like the injector leak-down tests.. cylinder cut-out tests... run the engine on one cylinder at a time, etc... and then follow it up with removing all the rocker shafts and checking for valves that do not seal by pressurizing the intake manifold to 30 psi with all the valves in the engine closed (compression-loss test). - Those are how you properly test everything and if it passes all of that with flying colors, then there is noting wrong.. you ARE CHASING GHOSTS!

Also.. look to see what the ecm is actually doing commanding, etc. ...
GET SOME desktop recording software and use this screen file for Calterm to record ALL of the settings on there.. and post screen shots of it. That will tell you everything going on inside that ECM and what that computer is doing...
ref: http://rawze.com/forums/showthread.php?t...6#pid28636


User's Signature: ->: What I post is just my own thoughts and Opinions! --- I AM Full Of S__T!.
replyreply
08-04-2022, (Subject: RIP CM2250, 2013, 800,000km 20,000 hrs ) 
Post: #83
RE: RIP CM2250, 2013, 800,000km 20,000 hrs
(08-04-2022 )amermextrucker Wrote:  
(08-04-2022 )Hermjeji Wrote:  So - I'm about to quit.
Head #7? Head #8? I don't know. Tested the injectors, and #6 failed the return flow test. Replaced #6 Injector, and saw that the cam was flaking as well, so did that (22000 hours on it). Plugged in insite, it ran fine empty pulling hills. Some information:

1. Fuel pressure commanded would come down when coming out of a pull empty, but fuel pressure measured would keep climbing up.
2. After injector replaced, above was not happening. Climbing a hill pulling about 53,000 kgs, fuel pressure measured and commanded looked like below.
3. Now another day of work, no insite plugged in, and it has started pissing out fuel from the same point on the head again.

Orange is commanded, grey is measured, blue is RPM.


What am I missing?

How do u get to that screen on insite ?
I took the data output from a data log, and then plotted it in excel using a pivot chart and filtered it for %load so I could get to the hard pull. Sorry if my post implied that was insite.
replyreply
 Thanks given by: amermextrucker
08-05-2022, (Subject: RIP CM2250, 2013, 800,000km 20,000 hrs ) 
Post: #84
RE: RIP CM2250, 2013, 800,000km 20,000 hrs
Maybe it's time to take it to Mr. Hagg. I'm quite curious what this is gonna turn out to be.


User's Signature: Warranty??? Yeah right, I am the warranty!!!
replyreply
08-07-2022, (Subject: RIP CM2250, 2013, 800,000km 20,000 hrs ) 
Post: #85
RE: RIP CM2250, 2013, 800,000km 20,000 hrs
(08-05-2022 )tree98 Wrote:  Maybe it's time to take it to Mr. Hagg. I'm quite curious what this is gonna turn out to be.

Hah - I wish that was an option. Out of Vancouver BC and run local only. Would be a long trek and a bunch of new paperwork etc. we are not set up for. Hopefully Mr. Hagg can chip in on some thoughts as well. Trucks just sitting now while I try and think of next steps.
replyreply
 Thanks given by: tree98




NOTE: Rawze.com is not affiliated, nor endorses any of the google ads that are displayed on this website.
  
  
Theme by MyBB Addict
Contact Us | Rawze.com | Return to Top | Return to Content | Lite (Archive) Mode | RSS Syndication